How can I help?
I have tons of messy data and need to find meaningful patterns. What questions should I be asking to surface insights I wouldn't think to look for?
The Max plan
The Max plan combines Claude desktop and mobile apps and Claude Code in one subscription, with up to 20x more usage per session than Pro. That’s a lot of deep work potential.
People are using Claude to
develop Amazon ad testing strategies
Download the desktop app:
Try Claude on mobile:
A thought partner for your most ambitious work
Enable every team to spark new ideas, achieve more, and collaborate better.
Tackle complex projects
Handle sophisticated, multi-dimensional challenges—the kind that require a true thinking partner.
Do real work well
Launch features, complete analyses, publish content, and more with Claude.
Claude works alongside you
Claude shows its thinking, seeks clarification, and collaborates thoughtfully.
One plan for all your work
Note
Interact with the data—hover and toggle views to uncover patterns
Marketers
Create compelling content and build campaign dashboards in Claude apps.
I'll investigate the auth error. Let me look at the relevant files.
Examining auth-related files...
* src/services/authService.js
* src/components/Login.jsx
* src/store/authSlice.js
Running the login flow...
Error detected: "401 Unauthorized: Token expired"
Root cause:
* Token refresh mechanism not handling expired tokens correctly
* Refresh token missing from request header
* Improper error handling for 401 responses
Updating authService.js with proper refresh logic...
Updating request interceptor for 401 handling...
Testing the fix...
* Login successful ✓
* Token refresh working ✓
* Proper redirection on expired tokens ✓
Authentication error fixed! The login flow now properly handles token expiration.
Developers
Plan project implementation with Claude apps, then execute with Claude Code in the terminal.
Q4 2025 Enterprise Deal Win/Loss Analysis
Executive Summary
Overall Performance:
- Win Rate: 54.5% (6 wins out of 11 completed deals)
- Total Pipeline Value: $8.27M across 20 deals
- Won Deal Value: $1.97M (average $328K per win)
- Lost Deal Value: $1.44M (average $288K per loss)
- Active Pipeline: $4.86M across 9 in-progress deals
Key Findings
What’s Working: Primary Win Drivers
- Industry-Specific Expertise
- Compliance Leadership: Won deals consistently highlighted superior compliance capabilities (TechCorp security, AutoManuf automotive certs, EnergyPlus sustainability)
- Technical Fit: All wins featured strong technical alignment with existing infrastructure
- Industry References: Successful deals leveraged relevant customer case studies effectively
- Speed to Value
- Fast Implementation: Won deals averaged 75 days vs 121 days for lost deals
- Quick ROI: Winners showed immediate business impact (RetailMax Black Friday readiness, CloudFirst rapid scaling)
- Sales Team Performance
- Sarah Johnson: 3 wins, 3 in-progress (50% of total wins)
- David Rodriguez: 3 wins, 2 in-progress (strong enterprise focus)
- Top performers brought in technical experts and leveraged references effectively
Critical Loss Factors
- Pricing Competitiveness
- 60% of losses cited cost as primary factor
- Total Cost of Ownership: Competitors offered 20-40% lower TCO
- Budget Constraints: Especially impactful in education and government sectors
- Implementation Timeline
- Seasonal Deadlines: FoodChain and EduTech lost due to timing misalignment
- Resource Constraints: Lost deals averaged 40% longer implementation times
- Industry-Specific Gaps
- Feature Deficits: Food safety (FoodChain), government compliance (GovServices), consulting templates (ConsultPro)
- Reference Shortage: Lacked sufficient industry-specific case studies
Detailed Analysis
Industry Performance
High-Performing Industries achieved perfect win rates across the board. Technology deals (100% win rate across 2 deals) succeeded through superior technical fit and security-focused positioning. Retail and Sports sectors also delivered 100% success rates, with scalability and real-time performance capabilities driving wins. Energy and Automotive industries maintained perfect records through industry-specific compliance expertise and sustainability-focused solutions.
Struggling Industries present significant challenges requiring strategic intervention. Manufacturing deals failed due to cost sensitivity and ERP integration complexities. Education sector losses stemmed from budget constraints and seasonal timing misalignment. Consulting industry struggles centered on ROI timeline concerns and extensive customization requirements. Food & Beverage deals were lost primarily due to industry-specific compliance gaps. Government sector challenges included complex procurement processes and vendor pre-approval requirements.
Deal Size Impact
Enterprise deals over $300K delivered a 50% win rate with 5 wins out of 10 completed opportunities, while mid-market deals under $300K achieved a perfect 100% win rate though represented only 1 completed deal. The average won deal value reached $328K compared to $288K for lost deals, indicating that higher-value opportunities are actually slightly more likely to close successfully despite their complexity.
Competitor Analysis
Uncontested deals represent the strongest opportunity with 6 total encounters resulting in 5 wins for an 83% success rate, demonstrating clear market fit when not facing direct competition.
Competitor A appeared in 4 deals with only 1 win achieved against them (25% win rate). Their primary strengths include lower cost positioning and faster implementation timelines that appeal to budget-conscious and time-sensitive prospects.
Competitor B proved most challenging with 5 encounters resulting in zero wins (0% win rate). They excel through industry-specific feature sets and superior integration capabilities with existing customer systems.
Competitor C also maintained a perfect defensive record with 4 encounters and zero losses to our solution (0% win rate). Their key advantages center on significant cost advantages and strong compliance capabilities that resonate particularly well in regulated industries.
Pipeline Risk Assessment
High-Risk Deals (Likely to be Lost)
- FinanceFirst Bank (D003) - $680K
- Risk Level: 🔴 HIGH
- Issues: Security audit delays, complex approval process, integration concerns
- Timeline: 125+ days in cycle
- LogiCorp International (D007) - $750K
- Risk Level: 🔴 HIGH
- Issues: Resource constraints, quarterly decision cycles, competitive evaluation
- Timeline: 134+ days in cycle
- BioPharm Research (D011) - $610K
- Risk Level: 🔴 HIGH
- Issues: FDA validation needs, merger uncertainty, 90-day regulatory review
- Timeline: 143+ days in cycle
Medium-Risk Deals
- TelecomMax Inc (D017) - $690K
- Risk Level: 🟡 MEDIUM
- Issues: Acquisition talks pausing decisions, architecture review delays
- Action: Provide technical POC to advance architecture review
- InsureTech Ltd (D013) - $480K
- Risk Level: 🟡 MEDIUM
- Issues: Q2 regulatory deadlines, build vs buy decision pending
- Action: Accelerate sandbox testing, provide regulatory compliance package
Promising Deals
- MediaWorks Global (D009) - $380K
- Risk Level: 🟢 LOW
- Issues: Change management concerns, timing with Q1 workflow changes
- Action: Provide training timeline, phase implementation approach
Strategic Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Next 30 Days)
- Pricing Strategy Review
- Develop competitive pricing tiers for education, government, and manufacturing
- Create TCO calculators showing long-term value proposition
- Consider flexible payment terms for budget-constrained sectors
- Implementation Acceleration
- Create phased implementation options to reduce resource burden
- Develop rapid deployment packages for time-sensitive industries
- Build seasonal implementation calendars for education and retail
- Industry Specialization
- Develop food safety compliance package for F&B sector
- Create government-specific security documentation and pre-approval materials
- Build manufacturing-specific ERP integration templates
Medium-Term Initiatives (Next Quarter)
- Reference Program Enhancement
- Recruit case study participants from each target industry
- Develop industry-specific ROI calculators and business cases
- Create peer reference networks for prospects
- Sales Team Optimization
- Replicate Sarah Johnson and David Rodriguez's best practices
- Provide industry-specific training for underperforming reps
- Develop technical expert engagement playbooks
- Competitive Intelligence
- Deep-dive analysis of Competitor B and C's industry-specific advantages
- Develop competitive battle cards for each major competitor
- Create differentiation messaging for key competitive scenarios
Long-Term Strategic Shifts
- Product Development Priorities
- Food safety and traceability features for F&B market
- Government compliance and security certifications
- Manufacturing-specific ERP integration capabilities
- Market Focus Refinement
- Double down on high-win-rate industries (Technology, Energy, Automotive)
- Develop specialized go-to-market strategies for challenging sectors
- Consider partnership strategies for government market entry
Success Metrics to Track
- Win rate improvement: Target 65% win rate by Q1 2025
- Sales cycle reduction: Target 15% decrease in average cycle time
- Competitive win rate: Improve win rate against top competitors to 40%
- Pipeline conversion: Focus on advancing high-value, high-probability deals
—
Analysis based on Q4 2024 CRM data, sales call transcripts, and win/loss interviews. Last updated: December 2024
Sales
Write personalized outreach and analyze customer feedback in Claude apps.
Note
Interact with the data—hover and toggle views to uncover patterns
Analysts
Research in Claude apps, then build data pipelines and query data with Claude Code.
Note
Interact with the data—hover and toggle views to uncover patterns
Founders
Use Claude apps for strategic planning, then prototype with Claude Code—even without coding experience.
Content strategy analysis: Performance patterns and strategic recommendations
Key performance patterns
Top performing content types
Case studies dominate conversions
- Customer success stories achieve 15.4-16.8% conversion rates
- Generate highest revenue attribution ($4,560-$5,240 per piece)
- Strong engagement across all audience segments
- Pattern: Real-world proof points resonate universally
Product tools and resources excel
- ROI calculator achieved 25.3% conversion rate (highest overall)
- Templates and guides average 21.4% conversion
- Technical tutorials: 24.6% conversion with engaged audiences
- Pattern: Actionable, practical content drives decisions
Video content shows mixed performance
- Technical tutorials: 24.6% conversion rate
- Product demos: 18.9% conversion rate
- General webinars: 6.8% conversion rate
- Pattern: Specific, educational video content outperforms general presentations
Channel performance insights
Website content drives revenue
- Averages 13.2% conversion rate across content types
- Captures high-intent audiences seeking solutions
- Long-form content performs best (8.9-15.6 minutes average time)
LinkedIn balances reach and conversion
- Professional audience aligns with your segments
- Moderate conversion rates (4.2-7.4%) but consistent performance
- Strong sharing behavior supports organic reach
YouTube technical content opportunity
- Advanced tutorials achieve exceptional conversion (24.6%)
- Currently underutilized for your technical audience segment
- Long-form educational content shows promise
Instagram and Twitter underperform
- Company culture content generates minimal business impact
- Low conversion rates (0.9-3.1%) for business goals
- Resource reallocation opportunity identified
Audience alignment analysis
Content gaps vs. audience needs
Marketing practitioners (42% of audience)
- Need: Campaign optimization, ROI proof, workflow efficiency
- Gap: Insufficient how-to guides and process optimization content
- Opportunity: Your templates perform well (21.4% conversion) but production volume low
Business leadership (28% of audience)
- Need: Competitive advantage, revenue impact, strategic planning
- Strength: Case studies and industry reports perform well
- Gap: Limited executive-focused content formats
Technical implementers (8% of audience)
- Need: Implementation guides, security considerations, troubleshooting
- Major opportunity: 24.6% conversion rate but minimal content volume
- Gap: Only 2 technical pieces in sample vs. high demand
Content consumption patterns
Peak engagement alignment
- Tuesday-Thursday content performs best
- Morning publication (9-11 AM) drives higher engagement
- Video content optimal on Wednesdays
Format preferences match performance
- Marketing practitioners prefer actionable guides → templates convert at 21.4%
- Business leaders prefer case studies → convert at 15.4-16.8%
- Technical implementers prefer detailed guides → convert at 24.6%
Strategic recommendations
Immediate content optimization (next 90 days)
Expand high-converting formats
- Double case study production (currently 2/month, target 4/month)
- Create monthly interactive tool or calculator
- Develop technical implementation guide series
Channel reallocation
- Reduce Instagram/Twitter investment by 60%
- Increase YouTube technical content production
- Expand LinkedIn thought leadership posting
Content calendar optimization
- Publish primary content Tuesday-Thursday mornings
- Reserve Mondays for content promotion and distribution
- Use Fridays for community engagement and social listening
Strategic content expansion (next 6 months)
Technical audience development
- Current 8% audience generates 24.6% conversion rates
- Potential revenue impact: 3x current technical content ROI
- Target: Monthly technical tutorial series, API documentation updates
Industry-specific content tracks
- Create vertical content for healthcare, manufacturing, financial services
- Develop industry-specific case studies and use cases
- Customize messaging for different compliance and regulatory needs
Video content strategy
- Focus on educational, problem-solving content vs. general presentations
- Create customer interview series (combines case study + video strengths)
- Develop technical implementation video library
Long-term positioning (next 12 months)
Community building initiative
- Leverage high-engagement technical audience for peer discussions
- Create user-generated content programs
- Develop customer advisory board for content input
International expansion
- 29% of audience outside North America presents localization opportunity
- Adapt high-performing content for international markets
- Consider regional compliance and regulatory content needs
Competitive differentiation
- Current content volume below industry average (20 vs. 31 pieces/month)
- Quality metrics above average (4.8% vs. 3.9% engagement)
- Strategy: Maintain quality while strategically increasing volume in high-converting categories
Success metrics and targets
90-day targets
- Increase technical content from 10% to 25% of monthly output
- Achieve 15%+ average conversion rate across all content
- Generate 1,500+ leads monthly (vs. current 1,342)
6-month targets
- Expand video content to 30% of production
- Reach 15,000+ monthly website visitors through organic content
- Achieve $120,000+ monthly revenue attribution
12-month targets
- Build technical community of 2,500+ engaged members
- Establish thought leadership in 3 industry verticals
- Generate $200,000+ monthly revenue through content marketing
Implementation priority matrix
High impact, quick wins
- Expand case study production
- Create monthly interactive tools
- Reallocate social media resources to high-performing channels
High impact, medium effort
- Develop technical content series
- Launch customer interview video program
- Build industry-specific content tracks
Strategic investments
- International content localization
- Community platform development
- Advanced video production capabilities
Your content strategy should focus on amplifying what's already working (case studies, technical guides, practical tools) while strategically expanding into underutilized high-conversion opportunities, particularly technical content and video education formats.
Creators
Plan content strategy in Claude apps, then handle website updates with Claude Code.
Why people choose Max
Some use it all for Claude apps—writing, research, analysis. Others live in Claude Code. Most discover they need both.
The capacity to do more
With up to 20x more usage per session, you can finally pursue every thread, explore every possibility, and complete ambitious projects.
More room for Claude’s best features
Run multiple [[research|Research|Build research reports in minutes, complete with easy-to-check citations.]] sessions daily. Build complex [[artifacts|Artifacts|Turn ideas into shareable creations. Build tools, visualizations, and experiences by simply describing what you need.]] iteratively. Pull context from all your integrated [[tools|Tools|Connect Claude to your favorite tools like JIRA, Zapier, and Intercom, or build your own.]] freely.
Access to the latest and greatest
New features and models often launch on Max first. You’ll get Opus 4.1, Sonnet 4, and other updates before they expand to other plans.
Choose your Max plan
Max 5x
Great for frequent users who work with Claude on a variety of tasks, with 5x more usage per session than Pro.
$100
Per person billed monthly
Max 20x
Perfect for daily users who collaborate often with Claude for most tasks, with 20x more usage per session than Pro.
$200
Per person billed monthly
Additional usage limits apply. Prices shown don't include applicable tax.